Go Search!
 
 



Release Date: April 9, 2003

SOCIAL SUPPORT AT WORK
PROTECTS THE HEART

By Ann Quigley, Contributing Writer
Health Behavior News Service


Social support at work is associated with lower blood pressure during the workday and smaller blood pressure increases during work-related stressful moments, according to a study of New York City traffic enforcement agents.
 

The researchers focused their study on traffic enforcement agents in the city because of the stressful nature of traveling around the city issuing parking tickets and other vehicular violations. “Motorists often insult, threaten or curse at the agents, and in previous studies agents have reported an average of three negative interactions with motorists per day,” say study authors Elizabeth Brondolo, Ph.D., and William Karlin, Ph.D., of the Department of Psychology at St. Johns University in Jamaica, N.Y.

But high levels of interpersonal stress at work are not unique to traffic agents. “Other law enforcement groups, customer service representatives and others are exposed to high rates of interpersonal stress at work and may be responsive to workplace social support,” Brondolo adds.

Previous studies have found emotional support from a network of family and friends is protective against cardiovascular disease, but the exact mechanism remains poorly understood. One line of thinking, called the main-effect model, suggests that social isolation has a negative effect on heart health in both stressful and non-stressful times. In contrast, the buffer-effect model suggests that social support protects against blood pressure and heart rate increases only under high-stress conditions.

Brondolo and colleagues tested both of these models with the help of 70 male and female New York City traffic enforcement agents, aged 22 to 58 years. More than half of the agents were African American, and the rest were Latino, Asian, white, Native American or of mixed race. An unobtrusive unit strapped to the participants’ chests monitored their blood pressure and heart rate throughout the workday. The participants also completed journal entries on their workday whereabouts and activities, and they completed a questionnaire measuring their perceived emotional support from coworkers, immediate supervisors and unit supervisors.

Brondolo and colleagues found that workplace social support was associated with lower blood pressure during acute periods of stress, and generally lower blood pressure levels throughout the workday. In general, the researchers found more support for the buffer-effect model than for the main-effect model; that is, the strongest heart-protective effects of social support emerged in high-stress rather than low-stress conditions. The most stressful work activities for the traffic agents were issuing summonses and communicating with motorists.

“Our results are consistent with a body of laboratory research that suggests that the presence of a socially supportive person reduces cardiovascular reactivity in socially threatening situations,” says Brondolo. The study results are published in the current issue of Psychosomatic Medicine.

The researchers also noted males and females had different preferred sources of social support. Lower blood pressure among females tended to have a link with immediate supervisor support, while males tended to benefit from co-worker support. These findings are consistent with previous research.

“Men may benefit more than women from coworker support because close social relationships may sometimes be a source of stress or demand for women,” Brondolo says. “Both men and women are more likely to seek social support from women and playing the role of caregiver or support provider can be demanding and stressful.”

Different sources of workplace social support were also found to have different effects on heart rate and blood pressure measurements. For example, while support from an immediate supervisor exerted a positive effect on the participants’ workday blood pressure and heart rate measurements, support from a unit supervisor support had no significant effect.

“Agents have relatively little contact with their unit supervisors, whereas they frequently interact with their immediate supervisors and coworkers,” Brondolo notes.

“Overall the relations of workplace social support to workday blood pressure measurements may be complex in that they may depend on the source of workplace support, the gender of the participant, the level of stress in a given situation, and the measure of cardiovascular response,” Brondolo concludes. “Future research on work-place social support should pay particular attention to these potential moderating factors.”

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health.

# # #

Health Behavior News Service: (202) 387-2829 or www.hbns.org.
Interviews: Contact Elizabeth Brondolo at (718) 990-6496 or brondole@stjohns.edu.
Psychosomatic Medicine: Contact Victoria White at (352) 376-1611, ext. 5300, or psychosomatic@medicine.ufl.edu. Online, visit www.psychosomaticmedicine.org.

Center for the Advancement of Health
Contact: Ira R. Allen
Director of Public Affairs
202.387.2829
press@cfah.org